Anonymous asked: I don't know what you guys see besides his kind heart, Harry is very unattractive, William just lost his hair but he is very handsome and always was. Harry reminds me of Conan Obrien, just looks like any other ginger, I don't get the obsession. Quite frankly most of you wouldn't give Harry your number if he was a regular guy that passed by you in the park and sweetly told you he noticed how beautiful you were. Most of you would decline. Only because you know he's a prince you're over the clouds
Well, i do think he is hot, so…
He is very attractive for me, being kind is just something that makes it better, if he was an ordinary man asking my number I would totally marry him lol but its just my opinion, I respect yours but man, he is hot.
Isn’t a kind heart enough? I don’t know about other people but I find kindness kind of hot!
There is a reason women swoon over men with babies or with puppies. It is because the man is showing a soft side, a kindness they are showing their heart.
Harry is not my type physically but I do love his heart.
But after all, as they say, love is blind
Yes indeed.Also you cannot change your mind about liking someone because other people don’t find him/her attractive or handsome.It’s personal.In my opinion, having different tastes and preferences is a very welcome variety and also kind of fair.As for Harry, he is very attractive for me .His warm personality just makes him even more irresistible (for me).
Prince Charles and Harry spam
10 days until the start of polo season.
Anonymous asked: I don't care how beautiful his smile is, I have not been convinced lately that Harry is turkey happy, it seems the "spare heir" effect is starting to take a toll on his spirit. He's looking for love, he continues to help the world but is instead critiqued even for his love interest! while Will & Kate get all the love for no Exact reason besides the fact that they are future king and queen and Kate is pretty. I'm only human so I have to be honest, if I were in Harry's position if be very sad.
I think Harry has already come with terms that the press will always treat him like that have. I don’t think it affects him that much, but it must be annoying to see your own brother being treated better for no reason other than he will be king, when he hasn’t earn not even half of the good press he gets, when Harry imo has proven he does more than william yet is treated the worse.
I think too that he has got used to that treatment, years now.
I just hope that he doesn’t consider himself less worthy than them, because no one can be less than zero!
He hasn’t been spotted in so long, and today he was a no show at the Easter service with his family. What is he up to?
He wasn’t at Easter last year either so I wasn’t really expecting to see him! I miss his face though :(
I think his disappearance comes down to a) he may have been told to lay low until the Cambridge tour is over and b) Richard Palmer is so busy ass kissing in Australia, hes completely forgotten that other royals exist.
Hello!Either case he is left in peace.I wish he enjoys it.
They are in six separate segments, which means six separate videos. Sorry guys, that’s just the way I was able to get my hands on them :)
But here are the links:
I have nothing against Kate. I am sure that she is nice, that she is a good wife, a good daughter, a good person, and of course, a great mother. But I do have a problem with her being held up as an ideal of exemplary womanhood, a wonderful role model for our daughters, an antidote to the Kim Kardashians of the world.
Because this outpouring of adoration is for a woman whose job description is basically:
“Have some babies.”
“Don’t rock the boat.”
History is littered with cautionary tales of women who did not follow the above script. One word in particular springs to mind: Fergie.
I know, I know, the royals have learned so many lessons since the Diana-Fergie days. Kate and Wills, the story goes, are a love match. I’m sure they are, but it was a love match for which a woman had to to sacrifice her freedom, her youth, her independence and, many would argue, her personality. To marry the man of her dreams, she had to change who she was, give up her privacy, paid employment, ensure her 20s were entirely scandal-free and lose half her body weight. This is not something I would wish for my daughter.
And that’s why Duchess Kate is dangerous for our daughters. She has revived the idea that women being defined by who they marry is a positive life choice.
So I’m sorry people, she’s not just like you. And I don’t want my daughter to be like her.
I dont have kids but I thought the full article and accompanying comments were an interesting read.
If only our fandom wasn’t crazy because we could actually discuss this and how its basically the heart of today’s feminist debate.
Personally when it comes to the BRF and feminism my first gripe is bring back the Yorks followed by proper titles if you marry in followed by gender free succession rights!
I understand the theory behind this, but what this article fails to take into consideration is that part of being a woman should be recognizing that not every woman has to have a gigantic voice and do whatever she wants to be someone to look up to. Some women would do all the things Kate has done to be with the man she loves. And that’s okay. Because it was her decision to do that. And as a woman, it should be respected that she made that decision for herself. That’s what admirable. She knew what she was getting into (unlike William’s own mother) and she still stepped into it. That takes guts…huge freaking guts.
In the engagement interview, William himself said that part of the reason they waited so long was so that she had a chance to get out if she wanted to. He gave her the option and she chose to marry him and to accept the life.
I would be proud of my daughter if she showed as much strength of character, as much resiliency as Kate has through the years. Being able to withstand the amount of hate and ruthless stalking by the media that she has within the last ten years is something I would never be able to do.
Just because she isn’t out there rocking the boat, doesn’t mean she isn’t a strong woman that shouldn’t be admired.
The problem is not that she is not “rocking the boat” it’s that she is not doing anything, not having any voice, besides being a stepford wife with a title.
”Rocking the boat” is not in her agenda.Because you can never know the consequences of rocking (they can be domestic as well as non-domestic).
So ”hear all” ”see all” ”say nothing” are safer practices.
Besides people’s opinion is so volatile.They easily turn against those once fawned on.
So I understand her stance.
But the ”power” the two of them have , due to their appeal to a large part of the public, is so valuable and it’s a pitty that they seem to be so idle.They could work miracles!